1-3-2-6 | Betting Strategy Analytics

1-3-2-6

Four-step win sequence: stakes 1, 3, 2, then 6 units.

Positive progressionHigh riskBacktestableRule v1 (one_three_two_six engine v1)

Backtest this strategy Compare

How it works

Any loss returns to step one. Completing all four winning steps also resets to step one.

Canonical rules

Plain-language summary of the published rule version (same snapshot stored on every backtest).

Stakes 1, 3, 2, 6 units for consecutive wins. Any loss resets to step 1; completing step 4 resets to step 1.

Push / void: Push returns the stake and does not change progression; the next stake equals the current stake.

View stored rule JSON

{
  "rule": "Stakes 1, 3, 2, 6 units for consecutive wins. Any loss resets to step 1; completing step 4 resets to step 1.",
  "pushRule": "Push returns the stake and does not change progression; the next stake equals the current stake."
}

Default parameters

{
  "unit": 1
}

Risk profile

If you lost 5 bets in a row from a fresh cycle (ignoring caps):

Total staked5

Next stake1

Pros

Fixed short progression
Clear maximum win-run target

Cons

Single loss resets progress
Volatile bankroll swings

Mini-simulator

Enter a W / L / P sequence to see stakes using the same engine code as backtests.

Outcome sequence

Use W (win), L (loss), or P (push), separated by spaces or commas.

Step	Outcome	Stake
1	LOSS	1
2	LOSS	1
3	WIN	1
4	LOSS	3
5	WIN	1
6	WIN	3

Past results don't predict future results. No staking strategy overcomes the bookmaker margin in the long run.